Aditya Mani Tripathi Abstract: The article analyses the critical gap in accessibility of mental health facilities in prisons, which violates Article 21 of the Constitution under contemporary judicial precedents. The article proposes […]
Vinayak Kedia Abstract: This piece assesses two key changes brought to §7 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 by the 2026 amendment: an obligation to register for a transgender […]
Sarthak Sahoo* The Constitution of India is routinely amended. Occasionally, a constitutional court will render such amendments unconstitutional. In that case, if the amendment purported to change the text of the Constitution, […]
Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj* Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees a fundamental right “to know”. But what information does a citizen have a right to know? The Supreme Court’s Electoral Bonds judgment lays […]
Hardik Kuldeep* The Judiciary is difficult to hold accountable as it enjoys broad independence and lacks transparency. It appoints Judges in the Higher Judiciary through the Collegium system, which is not beholden […]
Aravind Sundar* The case commentary on ‘X v Union of India’ scrutinizes the contradictory approaches within India’s abortion jurisprudence, navigating between statutory limitations and judicial interpretations favoring reproductive autonomy. The Medical Termination […]
Shubham Sehgal and Saksham Chaturvedi* Introduction On 10th August 2023, the Union Law Minister introduced The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill, […]
Shikhar Sharma Introduction The amendments to the IT Rules (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) 2021 were notified on 5th April 2023. They designate gaming companies as intermediaries (under Section 2(w) […]
Shikhar Sharma In this piece, the author analyses the judicially-created distinction between hobby and profit motive seen in the Indian Supreme Court’s Article 19(1)(g) jurisprudence. The author argues that relaxing this distinction […]
Kanishk Srinivas A three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justices Chandrachud, Surya Kant and Vikram Nath in the U.o.I v. Mohit Minerals case held that the “recommendations” of the GST […]
