Shauryaveer Chaudhry & Aastha Nayak Hosted by Aastha Nayak and Shauryaveer Chaudhry, Senior Editors at the Law School Policy Review, this podcast examines India’s intellectual property framework. The discussion draws on Prashant […]
Shauryaveer Chaudhry & Aastha Nayak Hosted by Aastha Nayak and Shauryaveer Chaudhry, Senior Editors at the Law School Policy Review, this podcast examines India’s intellectual property framework. The discussion draws on Prashant […]
Simmi Parihar & Darshit Agarwal Source: Arunesh Blog, “Regressive Bill Insults Trans People, Pushes India Decades Back”, available at https://aruneshblog.com/regressive-bill-insults-trans-people-pushes-india-decades-back/. Abstract: The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, tends to […]
Shauryaveer Chaudhry, Devang Pandey, Izzuddin Qasam and Shreyansh In this episode of the Law School Policy Review podcast, Shauryaveer, Devang, Izzuddin and Shreyansh speak with Professor Anton Zimmermann of Heidelberg University on […]
Yash Pathak & Hussain Hashmi Abstract: This article argues that CAS’ jurisdiction remains fundamentally contractual, while the exercise of its authority remains constrained by mandatory public law. Examining recent Swiss and European […]
Aastha Nayak & Vinayak Kedia Ujjwal Sharma and Vedika Mittal speak with LSPR Editors Aastha Nayak and Vinayak Kedia about the improvised architecture underneath India’s personality rights, a body of law built […]
Tanya Sara George & Siya Deshmukh Abstract: This article examines the implications of common ownership for competition in India’s increasingly oligopolistic markets. It assesses whether the existing material-influence framework adequately captures the […]
Simar Aneja Abstract: The 130th Constitutional Amendment Bill mandates removal of ministers detained for thirty days butstays silent on back pay upon reappointment following acquittal. This paper argues such removalfunctions as a […]
Akriti Lamba Abstract: Transgender communities have existed in India from times immemorial. However, the 2026 Amendment limits the definition of “transgender person”, limiting which communities can claim protection under the law. This […]
Sr. Adv. Diya Kapur, senior advocate at the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court, moderates a panel of Prof. (Dr.) Arul George Scaria, court-appointed amicus curiae in the case, Prof. (Dr.) […]
Sanidhya Kapoor Abstract: This piece argues that the Transgender Amendment Act, 2026 undermines its own aim owing to the drafting inconsistencies in Section 18. The narrow ‘against the will’ standard fails to […]